• About
  • Good Links

flawed but functioning

flawed but functioning

Category Archives: writing

The Intangible Work

09 Thursday Aug 2012

Posted by K.Lo in writing

≈ 5 Comments

Last week at Glen West, a conference organized by Image Journal (you can read more about it here if you’re interested), the idea or message that putting in the hours of work is the most important aspect of being an artist kept coming up.  It came up directly in artist Barry Moser’s observation that “talent is as common as house dust and as useful as tits on a boar; the habit of hard work has value.”  It also emerged as my own workshop instructor, poet Robert Cording, talked about how he likes to work on poems in 4-hour blocks of time, and that he doesn’t see much point in working on them for any less than 2 hours at a time because what usually comes out in the first hour is junk, and it’s not until the second hour that the good stuff starts to rise to the surface.  Every afternoon and evening at the Glen, we heard talks and readings and watched presentations from extremely accomplished writers, artists, musicians, etc.–people who have dedicated their lives to pursuing their respective crafts.  Since I’ve been home, I’ve been watching Olympic athletes who have trained for eight hours a day for the past decade to be where they are.

Needless to say, this is all very impressive and inspiring.  Focused attention and long hours of hard work are necessary for any really worthwhile accomplishment, and there is a part of me that yearns to experience that.  What would it be like to dedicate yourself so fully to a single pursuit?  But the reality is that most of us don’t and/or can’t live that kind of life.  We have jobs, mortgages, spouses, children needing to be shuttled to soccer practice or potty-trained, community involvement, houses that need to be cleaned and repaired, health conditions that need attending to, and dozens of other things that take up our time in very unavoidable and legitimate ways.  Obviously, many of the ‘single-pursuit’ folks mentioned above have the same things in their lives, except for one–they’ve managed to carve out a life where their pursuit is their job, which tends to free up a lot of time.

So what do the rest of us do?  When my school year is in full swing, I’m lucky if I can find a full hour to write on a regular basis.  I can squeeze in two on the occasional weekend, but four is pretty much out of the question.  The easy answer is that we can still make progress, no matter how minimal the time, as long as we are dedicating some time on a regular basis.  Our progress might not be as great as those who can dedicate double or triple the amount that we can, but we still can and will make progress.  The problem or tension remaining, however, is finding the will to dedicate even smaller blocks of time to pursuing a craft on a regular basis.

The ‘single-minded pursuers,’ as mentioned previously, tend to achieve some pretty impressive results:  publication, awards, critical acclaim, and so on.  They have something to show for all their hours.  Those of us plugging along in bits and pieces at the bottom of the artistry totem pole might not have anything tangible to show for a very long time (and sometimes it feels like it will be never).  If you’re intentionally carving out time to write or pursue some other craft, people around you are eventually going to find out.  And then come the questions like, “Are you published?” or “Have you sold any paintings?” or “Hey, can you edit this paper/letter/whatnot for me?”

Here in the U.S., we live in a results-driven, rubric-measuring world.  If you’re going to spend a significant amount of time doing something, you’d better have something to show for it, and that’s tough for any aspiring writer/painter/poet/songwriter.  Not many people understand how significant it is to have figured out the most effective line breaks in a stanza or to finally arrive at just the right phrasing of a metaphor in your poem after weeks of working at it.  Ted Kooser’s assurance that the poems you struggle with that never quite work are often preparing you for the one that suddenly does (and maybe even, in some rare instances, gets published) is some consolation.  But mostly, there is no tangible result we can show off or point to.

At one point in our workshop, Cording said that the poems we write are “prayer work,” and that even if the poem turns out poorly, we’ve still learned something about ourselves.  I like the idea of toiling away at writing and revising as prayer work, because that takes it out of the results-driven mindset.  Though that mindset has tainted a certain amount of Western Christianity in current years (“Pray and you’ll prosper”, “Give money to this ministry and God will bless you”), the traditional view of prayer is that we pray to both know and become someone.  Sure, there are sometimes visible results to that practice, but much of the time there are not.  A state of being, a depth of love, humility, grace, and peace are all very difficult things to quantify.  There’s no rubric that can even begin to adequately measure them.

In the closing night of the Glen, poet Scott Cairns said, “You do not need to seek permission to pursue your art.  God gave you that permission when he made you the way that you are.”*  Our work might not have tangible results, but every half hour or hour that we dedicate to it, we are becoming more and more the person we were created to be.  Which seems pretty damn worthwhile.

*see correct quote in “comments”

Advertisement

Revision

18 Wednesday Jul 2012

Posted by K.Lo in writing

≈ 4 Comments

So here’s what I’m learning about revision:  it takes a very different skill set than creating a first draft does, and it kind of sucks.  I should probably back up and explain that I wrote a novel about three years ago.  That, for the most part, was a very exciting and even easy process for me.  I had a disciplined schedule, and the more I wrote, the more the ideas seemed to flow.  Scenes unfolded while I was writing, but also while I was driving, taking a shower, and unloading the dishwasher.  I was brimming with ideas and inspiration.

Even though I was teaching full time, I completed a first draft of 98,000 words in less than a year.  Yay!  I was excited.  My family was excited.  My friends were excited.  All of us were dreaming about it getting published and being turned into a movie and all that jazz that the euphoria of finishing a project like that makes you crazy and vain enough to believe.  And then some time passed and I came to realize that certain chunks of the story didn’t need to be there.  I was pretty proud of myself for cutting them out and thought I had this whole revision thing down.  Once I’d gotten the story a bit more streamlined, I began working on polishing the grammar and phrasing and figuring out chapter breaks.  Then I read an article about dialogue tags and another one about adverbs and did another revision to work on those issues.

After my fifth revision (and another year and a half later), I thought I’d arrived at a pretty polished and engaging draft, but I knew it still wasn’t quite where it needed to be.  The problem was that I could no longer identify a specific issue that I could work on fixing, and I was losing steam and getting pretty sick of the whole thing.  Right about that time, I happened to find out about a fundraising auction where you could bid online for a critique of your partial manuscript from various established authors and literary agents.  I bid on and won a critique from a young adult author I greatly admire and promptly sent off my first 50 pages.  She responded soon after with a very detailed and helpful analysis of my work that simultaneously encouraged me and submerged me neck-deep in a paralyzing pool of despair.

What was encouraging was that she had some very positive things to say about my writing and the story.  She also pointed out some elements that would be very easy for me to fix.  The pool-of-despair part came out of the fact that she felt the main reason my manuscript wasn’t quite hitting the mark was an issue of voice.  She admitted, with a generous amount of sympathy, that this is a tricky issue.  Voice is very difficult to define and there is no formula for how to nail it, and yet nailing it is essential to having a truly effective work of fiction.  So now I knew what I needed to fix, but the problem was that I didn’t know how to fix it.  And the thought of trying to sharpen my first-person-narrator’s voice through an entire 300+ page manuscript made me want to sob and/or take the longest nap ever.

Instead, I gave up on it.  I took the current draft off my computer desktop and filed it away in a folder within another folder so I wouldn’t have to see it anymore.  I put all the marked up paper drafts I had in the bottom dresser drawer of the guest bedroom.  And when people would ask me about it, I’d shrug and make vague sounds and change the subject.  In the months that followed, I became convinced that what I’d written was a huge steaming pile of crap and wondered why I ever thought anyone would be interested in it.  In her book Bird by Bird, Anne Lamott describes all these mean-girl thoughts as the radio station KFKD.  I was tuned in and hearing it in HD.

But the thing is, in spite of all that paralyzing discouragement, the pain of truly giving up and not doing anything more with my novel ended up being worse.  Plus, my friends (bless them) would not stop asking me about it.  So, at the beginning of this summer, I decided to go ahead and give it another try.  The problem was, I still didn’t know how to go about ‘fixing’ an entire manuscript.  Fortunately, Lamott’s book had a solution for this as well, which is also the basis of her title.  The answer was to approach it piecemeal.  Trying to fix an entire novel feels impossible.  But trying to fix the first 25 pages is definitely something I could manage, and once I realized I only had to try to improve 25 pages, I was actually able to start.

I can be a bit slow about obvious things, so this realization only occurred about a week and a half ago.  Since then, I’ve worked my way through about twelve pages.  It’s slow-going, painstaking work.  I don’t even know if I am actually making things better.  But I find hope in the fact that I am doing the work, sentence by sentence, page by page.  And maybe when I finish the first 25 pages, I’ll be ready to do the next 25.  For all of you with some big, overwhelming task looming before you, I imagine it’d be the same.  So make it small, and get started.

Doing

05 Thursday Jul 2012

Posted by K.Lo in writing

≈ 8 Comments

Last Sunday I was talking to a friend who shared something he was interested in writing and then, as soon as he shared it, expressed doubt as to whether it would actually ever happen.  He asked about my own writing, and I in turn shared about what I’d like to do but have yet to actually accomplish or even begin.  It seems like there are a lot of us out there who spend a lot of time thinking and talking about things we’d like to do, and yet so often we fail to actually do them.  Why is this?  Clearly we have a longing and desire for these things (which often seem to be of a creative nature), so why do they so rarely come to fruition?

In my own situation, there are a few contributing factors that I can identify.  One is that I’ve been extremely busy in the last couple weeks with travel, getting together with friends visiting from out of town, preparing for family visits, and doing all the errands, cleaning, and organizing necessary in setting up my newly renovated master bathroom.  Life gets busy, and there is an endless supply of demands on all of us.  The other is plain and simple fear.  What if I can’t do it?  What if it doesn’t turn out the way I want it to?  I have also often noticed in both myself and others a sense that spending time on these creative pursuits we long for isn’t a legitimate use of our time.  We feel a kind of apologetic embarrassment that we would consider spending time writing a short story or playing the piano to be as important as cleaning the bathroom.  But there is another element that is harder to put a finger on, which presents itself in that weird and mysterious lethargy that seems to invade and make me desire to watch a marathon of The Good Wife on DVD rather than actually sit down and write.  Why is this?  I love to write.  I know from past experience that I always feel good about having done so when I finish, even if I don’t feel good about the actual product (although it’s even more awesome when I do).  So why the dragging feet?

In Act 4 of Hamlet, Claudius advises Laertes, “That we would do, we should do when we would; for this ‘would’ changes and hath abatements and delays as many as there are tongues, are hands, are accidents; and then this ‘should’ is like a spendthrift sigh, that hurts by easing.”  Granted, Claudius was the villain of the play and was trying to manipulate Laertes into killing Hamlet when he spoke this.  But there is truth and beauty in what he says nonetheless and, ironically, directly speaks to Hamlet’s own flaw–his inability to take action.  It also speaks to the rest of us who have ever desired to do something worthwhile and good and yet haven’t ever gotten around to doing it.

In Christianity (and, I would venture, the world in general), there is a sort of popular tradition of thinking of sin as ‘bad’ behavior–doing something destructive like killing someone or cheating on your spouse or stealing money from your mom’s purse.  But the Greek word most frequently used for ‘sin’ in the New Testament, hamartia, literally means missing the mark.  The ‘bad behaviors’ are symptomatic of a larger issue of us not functioning the way we were designed to, the machinery of our souls going awry.  I happen to think this lethargy, these abatements, are part of that going awry.  We have a target in mind (“I want to do a blog,” “I want to write a novel,” “I want to learn to play the cello,” “I want to get back into drawing”) but then we turn and fire all our time and energy into other pursuits.

I don’t know of any obvious or easy solution to this (please post a comment if you happen to know one), but I know that in my own experience, community plays a key role.  I am more likely to write and pursue my creative interests when I am around and in contact with other people who are writing and pursuing their creative interests.  It also helps when people bug me about it and actually demand something of/from me.  And once I experience that, it makes me want to call out other people and their gifts in turn.  There is a verse in Ephesians 5 that says “everything that is illuminated becomes a light.”  So this is me calling you out:  do your thing–the thing that will give you joy and bring blessing to others–and let’s light each other up.

Notes from the Festival (Part 3)

20 Sunday May 2012

Posted by K.Lo in beauty, writing

≈ Leave a comment

Sadly, the festival is starting to feel like some hazy dream I once had a long time ago, but I am doing my best to keep hold of some of what I experienced and get a few more chunks of my notes up here before it slips away entirely.

The following are excerpts of Marilynne Robinson’s talk at the Festival, in which she primarily addressed the fear that has become such a large part of our culture, adapted to some degree from her essays in her latest book When I Was a Child I Read Books.

1.  The only people we should fear are those who could make us not love;  that you have one set of beliefs does not mean you are accusing others of not having them; people are willing to be gracious to religious expression that is gracious to them

2.  fear is a stimulant that makes you focus on things that aren’t there; it’s addictive and becomes normalized

3.  we think ourselves weak and threatened, which makes us deal unwisely and insensitively with others; we act as though people are justified in their fear and that it’s okay to act pre-emptively; in the old Westerns, the heroes were the ones who were reluctant to shoot–the cowards were the ones who shot first and didn’t want to take off their guns.

4.  we think we can’t write about what is most important to us, which creates tremendous anxiety; people get alienated from themselves because it’s so easy to stigmatize words and identities–this makes people vulnerable to having their identities stripped away.

5.  Whatever is essential to you is the basis of your human dignity.  There is a great dignity in refusing to fear.

6.  We need to talk people out of their crouch; if you’re frightened, you’ve let yourself be deprived of an important part of your dignity; if you’re frightened, you don’t trust God.  Trust God and abandon fear.

7.  In regards to writing Gilead and how popular it became:  “I was writing about something important and interesting to me, and that’s what people want for themselves.”

From a later interview:

1.  She loves Wallace Stevens–“he saturates experience with attention” and there is no greater writer in the American language; she admires his “devotion to the idea of the ordinary perceiver” and the transformation from the ordinary to the beautiful/transcendent.

2.  When asked about her popularity in fairly diverse settings (both liberal and conservative) and how that’s possible, she responded “I don’t recognize any obligation other than to speak what’s true.”

The Christian Science Monitor also did an article about her talks, which you can read here:  http://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2012/0424/Marilynne-Robinson-Why-are-we-so-afraid

Notes from the Festival (Part 2)

07 Monday May 2012

Posted by K.Lo in beauty, writing

≈ Leave a comment

There were a number of poets at the festival, and it was wonderful to hear them talk about their work and especially to hear them read their own poems.  Hearing any author read his/her work adds a depth and dimension that you just can’t replicate when you read it to yourself from the page, but I think this is especially true of poetry.  Maybe because poetry is (in part) a kind of music–as much an auditory experience of rhythm and sound as it is idea and meaning.  Below are some nuggets from three different poets.

      Li-Young Lee:

1.  He continually revises poems, even after they’re published.  Poems have two lives–they participate in a market economy and then there’s the level where they’re between him and God.  He does find that sometimes after he revises a published poem numerous additional times that the published version is actually the best version of it.

2.  He comes to the page each day and asks if there’s any word from the Lord, and then he writes and writes, but often, it’s just his own words.  He doesn’t want to be a writer/poet so much as he wants to make contact with the divine.  When he’s revising the poem, he’s also revising himself.

3.  Safety is of great concern to him.  The poems he heard in high school were beautiful but ‘unsafe.’  Christ’s voice in the New Testament is safe.  Blake’s voice in his poetry is safe.  Lee also wants to be a safe person.  When asked to define more clearly what he meant by ‘safe,’ he replied that safe poets are fully realized or wise; they bless what needs to be blessed and kill what needs to be killed.  Poets he put in this category are Adrienne Rich (“her later poems”), Philip Levine (“early poems”), Louise Bogan, Rilke, and Lorca.  Also loves John Logan (Catholic poet), Blake, and Dickinson.

4.  Prayer and poetry are refuges.  The paradigm for poetry is DNA–a compact structure that you can unpack infinitely.  “Practice until you feel the language inside you.”

5.  Commenting on his experience as an immigrant:  being a stranger is a powerful place to be–you can see things others can’t; you ask questions others don’t think to ask.

Poem he read at the beginning of the interview:  http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poem/182921

Maurice Manning:

1.  Part of what we do as writers is preserve things–writing has a ‘fixing’ effect.  Our country is becoming increasingly homogenized.  He loves meeting and talking to the ‘old-timers’ in Kentucky (his home) because they talk in a way that’s different and unique to their particular region.  That’s disappearing.

2.  Asked why he can be so honest in his poems (referring in particular to his poems written as prayers):  poetry implies a greater degree of intimacy (or can have) than prayer, which can be too formal for intimacy;  poetry needs to be a little messy–a few things out of place, “not like a linen closet.”

3.  He admires William Blake and feels that if you’re going to follow an impulse, you have to acknowledge its opposite.

4.  “It’s a great delight to take your dog on a walk on the leash and at a certain point, taking off the leash and letting it go.”  The same is true for poetry–the leash can be a good thing, but there are also moments where you need to let the poem go, let it run away from you and see where it goes.  “I follow my curiosity.”

Read more about and by Maurice here:http://www.poetryfoundation.org/bio/maurice-manning

Susanna Childress:

I attended a talk Susanna gave about using fictive elements in poetry, so most of these notes are related to that topic.

1.  the social contract between poet and reader isn’t as clear as it is with prose, which has fiction and non-fiction categories.  In poetry, it’s not always clear when the content is about the author, whether the speaker is the poet, etc.

2.  she likes to write a kind of hybrid of persona and personally fictive.  She will draw from friends’ experiences/stories as well as her own, and she will change details to fit whatever she’s trying to get across in the poem.

3.  there is the literal/historic truth about what really happened, and then there is the underlying truth–the poet’s allegiance should be primarily to the latter.  Sometimes content needs to bend to the truth.  Christian Wiman quote:  “To be a writer is to betray the facts

4.  using the fictive/imaginative in our own poems is important because we need to distance ourselves from our own experience.  We’re too tied to things and this can help us step back and focus on craft.  Also, when we employ fictive and imaginative elements, we haven’t arrived at meaning already.  Scott Cairns quote:  “The poem is where our words teach us what we haven’t yet apprehended.”

5.  It is the process and the place it takes us into–the threshold/sympathy.  When we can get there with other people’s experiences, it makes us wider and takes us out of ourselves.

6.  When asked about revision later, she said that her main ‘test’ of whether a poem is finished or not is if she can read it aloud all the way through and not think “chickenshit.”

Read one of her poems here:  http://www.blackbird.vcu.edu/v4n1/poetry/childress_s/what.htm

Newer posts →

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Recent Posts

  • Detour / Grandpa’s Love Language
  • Migration
  • You’re What’s Bad About America (and So Am I)
  • The Uncles
  • Holy Week 2018

Archives

  • September 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012

Categories

  • beauty
  • education
  • family
  • home ownership
  • introduction
  • musings
  • poetry
  • publications
  • random
  • Uncategorized
  • writing

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • flawed but functioning
    • Join 81 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • flawed but functioning
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...